renaming for clarity
This commit is contained in:
@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ class Channel {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void updateFinalValues(int cv1_value, int cv2_value) {
|
||||
void applyCvMod(int cv1_value, int cv2_value) {
|
||||
if (!isCvModActive()) {
|
||||
// If CV is off, ensure final values match the base values.
|
||||
cvmod_clock_mod_index = base_clock_mod_index;
|
||||
@ -98,25 +98,25 @@ class Channel {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// The channel knows its own config, so it selects the correct CV value.
|
||||
int active_cv_value = (cv_source == CV_1) ? cv1_value : cv2_value;
|
||||
int value = (cv_source == CV_1) ? cv1_value : cv2_value;
|
||||
|
||||
// Calculate and store final values using bipolar mapping.
|
||||
// Default to base value if not the current CV destination.
|
||||
|
||||
cvmod_clock_mod_index = (cv_destination == CV_DEST_MOD)
|
||||
? constrain(base_clock_mod_index + map(active_cv_value, -512, 512, -10, 10), 0, MOD_CHOICE_SIZE - 1)
|
||||
? constrain(base_clock_mod_index + map(value, -512, 512, -10, 10), 0, MOD_CHOICE_SIZE - 1)
|
||||
: base_clock_mod_index;
|
||||
|
||||
cvmod_probability = (cv_destination == CV_DEST_PROB)
|
||||
? constrain(base_probability + map(active_cv_value, -512, 512, -50, 50), 0, 100)
|
||||
? constrain(base_probability + map(value, -512, 512, -50, 50), 0, 100)
|
||||
: base_probability;
|
||||
|
||||
cvmod_duty_cycle = (cv_destination == CV_DEST_DUTY)
|
||||
? constrain(base_duty_cycle + map(active_cv_value, -512, 512, -50, 50), 0, 99)
|
||||
? constrain(base_duty_cycle + map(value, -512, 512, -50, 50), 1, 99)
|
||||
: base_duty_cycle;
|
||||
|
||||
cvmod_offset = (cv_destination == CV_DEST_OFFSET)
|
||||
? constrain(base_offset + map(active_cv_value, -512, 512, -50, 50), 0, 99)
|
||||
? constrain(base_offset + map(value, -512, 512, -50, 50), 0, 99)
|
||||
: base_offset;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user